![]() At certain points however, even the 18 Intel Xeon cores (36 with HyperThreading) is pushed beyond its limits by Premiere Pro. Playing around with 10 two hour long HD streams of Apple ProRes 422 in multicam mode in Adobe Premiere Pro on the fastest Mac currently available on the market (as of January 2019), with media stored on its blazing fast internal SSD storage, works pretty well in general. ![]() Media stored internally on the iMac Pro 4 TB SSDġ0 two hour long Apple ProRes 422 Standard 1920x1080 25i QuickTime MOV files, at 120 GB each.įiles recorded/created by an EVS XS Production Server. Radeon Pro Vega 64 with 16 GB of HBM2 memoryĪdobe Premiere Pro 2019, Version 13.0.2 (Build 38) ![]() Apple Final Cut Pro XĢ.3 GHz 18-core Intel Xeon W CPU, with Turbo Boost up to 4.3 GHz Multicam video playback performance test Adobe Premiere Pro vs. I have included the text from the test below. You can also see TCP stream analysis of single-stream video playback in the PDF. See the full test with graphs and metrics in the PDF above. Adobe-vs-Apple-multicam-performance-test.pdf Final Cut Pro X is using less 50% of the total CPU capacity on this old iMac, which is very impressive. The fact that even an old 2015 iMac 5K with a 4-core 4GHz Intel i7 CPU and 16 GB memory is able to play the same 10 streams of media in “High Quality” both from local storage and a NAS via 10 Gbit Ethernet and SMB3, while at the same time on the same machine doing a screen recording at full 5K resolution with Telestream ScreenFlow using 1 full CPU core of the 4 (8) available. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |